Skip to content

Opinion

Are we voting for or against?

Are we voting for or against?

Editor: This year’s local government elections are pivotal for many communities across B.C. The Sunshine Coast is no exception.
Let’s reach our full potential

Let’s reach our full potential

Editor: There is an old saying, “If you are standing still today, you are already going backwards.” Fourteen years ago a couple from Vancouver bought the yacht club building wanting to turn it into a restaurant.
Bring back our community

Bring back our community

Editor: I could not help noticing the similarities between Gibsons and Berlin this past week. Maybe we have erected our own wall the past three years.
Do your research first

Do your research first

Editor: Well, if ever I was scared for the future of a quaint, semi-rustic, seaside village (and my chosen home after living in every corner of North America), it is this week, and I am referring to Gibsons.
What will the future bring?

What will the future bring?

Editor: Gibsons’ future will soon meet its new administrators. This is a very critical time for our lovely little town.
Voting for all, SCRD

Voting for all, SCRD

Editor: As we come up to this year’s municipal elections, I would like to whole-heartedly endorse editor Ian Jacques’ call for absentee election options for the Sunshine Coast Regional District in his editorial Oct. 30.
Retirees also vote

Retirees also vote

Editor: Current council members and candidates pay homage to something called “economic development” as the solution to all of Sechelt’s woes.
Show our best side

Show our best side

Editor: In November 2011, the quietly positive majority of voters showed Sechelt’s best side in the Target Marine referendum. Sechelt voters backed the company in a landslide vote of 2,687 to 663.
Charlotte or George?

Charlotte or George?

Editor: This spring the Town of Gibsons invited residents to offer feedback on how to improve our official community plan (OCP).
Did we get a better Sechelt?

Did we get a better Sechelt?

Editor: In 2012, For a Better Sechelt pointed out that Sechelt’s residential tax burden was 86.3 per cent and that needed to change — and we needed more jobs.