Editor:
In a recent letter (Coast Reporter, May 11), Taneth Amos pits the interests of local camping enthusiasts against a group of "fear mongering" citizens who reside near Porpoise Bay Provincial Park. The author acknowledges that the park is a jewel but claims it has been ruined by these apparently radical individuals who support a clean air policy in the park. As someone who has camped at Porpoise Bay regularly for the better part of the last 20 years, I disagree with Taneth's extreme point of view.
Porpoise Bay Provincial Park has a lot to offer. In addition to the seaside location and lovely second growth forest, the beauty of Angus Creek and the estuary continue to inspire people of all ages throughout the seasons. There is a lot of wildlife. The beach, trails and open grassy areas provide abundant opportunities for recreation and serve as a base for cycling, kayaking and hiking activities beyond the park. The wide range of comfort facilities and programs is also impressive.
I understand that many people consider a fire to be an integral part of the camping experience. To argue, however, that the many positive attributes of Porpoise Bay Provincial Park are nullified simply because campfires are offered on a communal rather than private basis is perplexing.
Personally, I find the clean air policy to be progressive. During my annual escapes to Porpoise Bay from the urban centre where I previously resided, I greatly appreciated the park's clean air and water.
One of the last things I want when I go camping is to inhale smoke and wake up smelling of it in the morning.
Richard Carton, Sandy Hook
