Skip to content

Letters: Yes, 'urban infill' belongs in my backyard

'The occasional duplex is a welcome change to streets lined with cookie-cutter bungalows. I’d rather this property be re-zoned to house more than one family, than see more land de-forested for yet another subdivision of single-family dwellings.'
n-public-hearing
Rezoning application for 6401 Apple Orchard Road.

Editor: 

Brenda Sopel wrote “’urban infill’ is meant for the Village area and not West Sechelt.” (Letters Dec. 16 2022). 

That’s about as NIMBY as one could get. As a resident of West Sechelt living near Apple Orchard, I applaud better use of the land. The occasional duplex is a welcome change to streets lined with cookie-cutter bungalows. I’d rather this property be re-zoned to house more than one family, than see more land de-forested for yet another subdivision of single-family dwellings. While one property does not solve housing issues, one property is a move towards housing alternatives and changing how we think about our neighbourhood. One property zoned at a higher density is acceptable in my backyard. 

Beth Pitblado, Sechelt