Why log the watershed?


I had to laugh out loud when I read the “ELF has gone too far” letter. Either that or cry. Of course the district should own the land the watershed is in, otherwise our water supply gets contaminated from human activities like logging. It’s true that forest can regenerate, and some logging seems to be inevita  ble as a resource. However, we’re talking about the community water supply here, and about the alternative in a world of shrinking, clean water resources, already compromised with human and airborne pollution.

article continues below

The environment is going to hell in a handbasket, so it seems the only way to get some action from the powers that be on anything as crucial as water, is to do something “illegal” such as blocking a logging operation, while what “they” do is called “economic development” or, better yet, “progress.” There are other areas of forest to harvest, so why would anyone allow or advocate doing it in the area of the watershed?

Anna Banana, Roberts Creek

© Copyright Coast Reporter


NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus


Should a smoking area be provided for the seniors ar Greenecourt?

or  view results

Click here to read the story