Compassion for canines

Letters

Editor:

After reading the editorial in the May 31 edition (“Fireworks for the thousands”), I came to the conclusion that the editor is for the fireworks, and that he criticizes those people against the fireworks who are “trying to impose their will on everyone else.”

article continues below

The question of the fireworks is a delicate one, indeed. Should the excitement of thousands of people be more important than the well-being of thousands of animals, if not hundreds of thousands of them? Does the editor know that the author of the petition that promotes the fireworks has a link to another petition on her Facebook page promoting the ban of the Yulin Dog Festival in China? I understand that the two levels of animal cruelty are quite different (one is killing dogs for their meat, and the other one is upsetting them with loud bangs), but both sentiments against animal cruelty are based on the same fundamental premise: compassion for canines (which is stated in the petition against the Yulin Festival).

My question is: “How can a person who takes action to ban a festival out of compassion for canines also take action to bring back an event that upset many canines?” Where is the logic there? The only logic I can see is the following: “I feel compassion for the canines and will fight to protect their well being … as long as it doesn’t stop me from enjoying my excitement, in which case I will fight to keep enjoying my excitement at the expense of the canines.” Does that make sense to you?

Marc Theriault, Sechelt

© Copyright Coast Reporter

Comments

NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

QUESTION OF THE WEEK POLL

Do you support Ottawa’s decision to proceed with the Trans Mountain pipeline expansion?

or  view results

Click here to read the story

Popular Letters