Editor:
Attorney General David Eby’s proposed questions for a referendum on whether or not to change B.C.’s current electoral system, and if so to which new system, are in the wrong order and lack clarity.
First, it should be determined by government which proportional representation (PR) system of the many in use around the world is best suited for B.C. Then it can be asked whether the electorate wants to change from the current first past the post (FPTP) system to the proposed PR system.
In the proposed sequence of referendum questions, the electorate is being asked, “Do you like the current system or something else?” without knowing what the something else is.
By being asked which of three differing PR systems the electorate prefers, they are being asked a very difficult question for which the majority do not have the experience, knowledge or tools to make an informed decision. The decision requires detailed analysis of many factors and local conditions and cannot just be based on what works in New Zealand or Germany. It is a task best suited to a special committee made up of political science professionals, respected professional associations and informed members of the general public who have the time and ability necessary to consider not only all the various PR systems but also review the existing FPTP system, especially with regard to B.C.’s unique conditions.
The single PR choice of the proposed group could then be reviewed by the elected politicians who currently represent the general public and, if approved, become the proposed alternative system to replace the current system, if that is the wish of the majority of the electorate. Then the question can be simply: “Do you wish to retain the current FPTP system or change to the proposed PR system?”
Of course, prior to the referendum, it would be required that the strengths and weaknesses of each system be clearly explained to the electorate via an in-depth public information campaign.
Paul Huffington, Sechelt
