Editor:
In response to the “Lack of bridge support” by Brian Hulme (Letters, May 7), it is worth quoting the B.C. government’s 2017 fixed link report: “There is general support for a fixed link connection. Key reasons stated for support for a fixed link include improved travel times, improved community development, addressing B.C.’s jobs and housing challenges, and opening up B.C. However, consultation participants also expressed concerns about the potential negative effects of a fixed link for cyclists and pedestrians, and some participants indicated that they would prefer improved ferry service to a fixed link.”
That is NOT a lack of support. The NDP government made a political decision to not proceed with building a fixed link to the Sunshine Coast.
To add to Brian’s list of obvious advantages of a fixed link:
• No wasted time waiting at ferry terminals.
• Bridges require less maintenance, do not pollute, and unlike ferry boats, rarely need to be replaced.
• Ferries are serious polluters, requiring 1,300 litres of diesel fossil fuel (Queen of Surrey) for one 40-minute trip between Langdale and Horseshoe Bay.
• The ferry runs substantially below its design capacity (on average over a year) and that is seriously “wasteful.”
• With a bridge, emergency vehicles and others will have 24-7 access to the Lower Mainland.
• Building bridges and connecting highways will provide employment for local construction companies and crews.
• Although bridge infrastructure and highways are big capital costs, they are also a valuable investment for now and the future. Ferries cost a lot now and have a relatively short lifespan compared to a bridge.
• Bridges are usually attractive, a delight to both residents and visitors.
Bridges do not rule out marine traffic, including scenic ferry crossings for people’s enjoyment.
For more information visit this link: arrastudio.com/ferrymap.html
Elizabeth Scott and Hal Lindhagen, Halfmoon Bay
