Sidestepping responsibility

Editor:

Environment Minister Catherine McKenna’s March 18 decision that the Woodfibre LNG project “is not likely to cause significant adverse environmental impacts” put me in mind of a petition the federal Liberals, while in opposition, asked Canadians to sign. “I am opposed to the elimination of over 50 years of environmental protection through Bill C-38,” they encouraged us to tell then-Prime Minister Harper.

article continues below

One reason they gave was the Conservative government’s “repeal [and rewriting] of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act so the federal government can sidestep environmental reviews of potentially harmful projects.” The new rules allowed Conservative Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq, in February 2014, to accept B.C.’s environmental assessment process as a substitute for a federal assessment of Woodfibre LNG.

Here’s a question Coast Reporter might have asked, in its coverage of MP Goldsmith-Jones’s clattering last-minute Hear Your Woodfibre Views tour: Was Minister McKenna bound by her predecessor’s decision not to have a separate federal assessment? Or did she have the power to backtrack and require one, but chose not to do so? I’d still be interested to know.

David Stow, Elphinstone

© Copyright Coast Reporter

Comments

NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus

QUESTION OF THE WEEK POLL

Do you support preserving the Charman Creek Lands in Gibsons as a park?

or  view results

Click here to read the story.