Editor:
I am writing in response to op-ed regarding the ongoing drug crisis (“Opinion: Charting a path forward for harm reduction”). I commend the author for their dedication to addressing this issue.
In the realm of addiction, two approaches often arise: harm reduction and recovery. While they may seem divergent, they can complement each other, offering comprehensive support for individuals seeking wellness.
As harm reduction has its merits, it cannot stand alone in addressing the multifaceted nature of the drug crisis. We must prioritize comprehensive solutions that integrate treatment, prevention, enforcement and public safety measures.
As someone who has endured the effects of long-term addiction and is in recovery, I can attest that denial remains the foremost barrier to recovery. The harm reduction-only approach inadequately addresses the profound denial individuals experience when engulfed in the throes of addiction.
Without a clear path to recovery, individuals grappling with addiction remain ensnared in a cycle of substance use and despair. The absence of robust treatment and rehabilitation initiatives leaves many without the necessary support and guidance to overcome their addiction. Without a seamless continuum of care, this issue will persist, wreaking havoc on communities across B.C.
As we confront this epidemic, it is imperative that we listen to diverse perspectives and work collaboratively to develop effective strategies. I urge policymakers and community leaders to prioritize investment in treatment and rehabilitation initiatives.
As someone deeply committed to reducing harm, I witness firsthand the detrimental effects of clinging to the current paradigm, which disregards alternative avenues for aiding those in need. True harm reduction necessitates the establishment of inclusive relationships that encompass all pathways to recovery.
Pivot Empowerment Education and Recovery Society embraces harm reduction and empowers recovery.
Barbara Smith, Pivot board member
