Editor:
Re: “Embrace VCH plan” by Daniel Fontaine, Letters, July 8.
I have worked in seniors residential care for many years and find information in Mr. Fontaine’s letter misleading. He states: “Few people seem aware that 70 per cent of seniors’ care in British Columbia is currently delivered by the private sector (both non-profit and for-profit entities).”
There is a great difference between the non-profit and the for-profit entities. I would not label both of these providers in the same category.
Non-profits historically donate land, money, equipment, volunteers and other services to provide care. Most of the currently operating non-profits are ethnic, religious and service groups. They have fundraised to donate land and other amenities. They use all of the budget for resident care, which includes staffing, food and recreation, among other services. They continue to fundraise to improve the quality of life for seniors and provide additional services not included in the funding model.
The for-profit sector takes a portion of the public funding for profits. The profit line has to come from the operating budget, so cost cutting is of great importance and usually included as an expectation of all managers.
Christenson Village in Gibsons is an example of a non-profit. Trellis (rebranded Retirement Concepts) is an example of a for-profit. I would encourage the community to research their track records with respects to care.
Linda Ruiz, Gibsons
