Milne top spender in first civic election under new rules

New limits on contributions and spending in municipal campaigns changed the pattern of election spending, but didn’t seem to have a huge impact on the totals in the Sechelt mayoral race.

The new rules banned corporate and union donations and imposed spending limits during the campaign, but not in the lead-up.

article continues below

According to disclosures released by Elections BC this week, incumbent Bruce Milne spent just over $27,000 in his unsuccessful bid for reelection, while the eventual winner, Darnelda Siegers, spent around $14,900.

Those numbers dwarf the spending by the candidates for mayor of Gibsons.

The Siegers campaign spent $4,986.43 during the pre-campaign period and $9,932.37 during the campaign period, Sept. 22 to Oct. 20, when a $10,000 cap was in place.

Milne’s team spent much more during the run-up to the official campaign period – $18,285. It reported $8,835 in spending during the campaign.

Milne’s campaign contributions of $29,100 also reflect a different pattern from Siegers’. Over a 10-day period in August 2018 the Milne campaign received 23 individual contributions for the maximum $1,200 – all from people who did not contribute to his 2014 campaign. The only other individual contributions were $1,000 from Milne himself and two at $250 made just before Milne declared he was running for reelection.

Siegers reported nearly 60 individual contributions going back to 2017, but only three for the $1,200 maximum and six of over $500, for a total of $16,669

Al Holt spent just $2,924.75 in his bid to become mayor, funded from contributions from himself and his wife, and $700 from supporter George Goudie.

Council candidates faced a $5,000 spending limit during the campaign period, and only a couple came close to that figure – Alice Lutes, who declared expenses of $4,154, and Janice Kuester, who spent $4,032 in a winning election bid.

Only two other candidates, who both went on to win council seats, spent over $3,000 – Matt McLean and Eric Scott.

In Gibsons, Bill Beamish ran a self-financed campaign that spent $1,658 on his successful bid for mayor. Beamish also spent $910 on his campaign for council, before entering the mayoralty race after Silas White dropped out.

The highest spending mayoralty candidate was Blake MacLeod, who declared $3,047 in expenses. Les Thomson spent $1,446 and William Moysey’s campaign cost $648.

Council candidates in Gibsons also had a $5,000 spending limit, which Aleria Ladwig came closest to hitting with expenses of $4,412 in addition to $588 spent in the pre-campaign period. The next-highest spending campaign was that of Suzanne Senger, who declared total expenses of $3,836.

After a 2014 election that saw third parties spend heavily, only two third parties reported spending any money in support of candidates in Sechelt and Gibsons, with one spending less than $500 and the other spending $750.

Spending limits for SD46 school trustee candidates ran from $5,000 in Area 1 to $7,106.50 in Area 3. The Sunshine Coast Regional District rural areas all had limits of $5,000. There was also a $5,000 limit in the election for positions on the Sechelt Indian Government District advisory council.

Full disclosure statements for all local government candidates are available online at

© Copyright Coast Reporter


NOTE: To post a comment you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Google+ You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

comments powered by Disqus


Do you support the plan by conservation officers to conduct random property inspections?

or  view results

Click here to read the story.