Saturday April 19, 2014


question of the week

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





Manufactured outrage

Comments

Editor:

The level of rhetoric over the cancellation of a once-a-week early Sunday morning ferry run in the winter season seems a bit much.

The load for that trip averages about 14 per cent of capacity, which means they’re burning 2,400 litres of fuel, round trip, to operate a near-empty ferry. The run is indulgent, wasteful and enormously carbon intensive; it adds huge volumes of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere for little return.

It’s also financially extravagant. An analysis of the costs associated with Route 3 shows that we are already subsidized by $5 million a year. That’s much more than a similarly situated community accessible by road.

Is it reasonable to demand this level of subsidy and, at the same time, make absolutely no compromise on the schedule, even for one near-empty ferry run per week? Perhaps there are better ways to spend tax dollars. When you consider the environmental implications and the level of inefficiency, it does not seem unreasonable to ask people to adjust their schedules by an hour.

Speaking of indulgences, do we really need to provide free ferry rides for seniors? Today’s senior citizens have the lowest poverty rate of any demographic in the country, according to Statistics Canada. Additionally, the Organisation for Econ-omic Co-operation and Devel-opment tells us that those same seniors are better off than their contemporaries anywhere else in the developed world — that’s a good thing. But is it reasonable, then, to ask hard-pressed young families to subsidize discretionary travel for the relatively well-off elderly? Riding for half price seems generous enough.

The “massive protests” scheduled for later this month, led by the usual suspects, will undoubtedly be lots of fun. Even the “professionally enraged” need a hobby. More seriously, this issue smacks of manufactured outrage and partisan politics rather than a genuine concern for the community.

Keith Maxwell, Sechelt


Comments

Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2014 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy
Business in Vancouver Whistler Question Squamish Chief Powell River Peak Real Estate Weekly My Local Flyers

LOG IN



Lost your password?