Sunday April 20, 2014


question of the week

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.





Council rejects Rogers tower deal

Gibsons
License Comments

Gibsons council rejected a proposal by Rogers Communications for a telecommunications tower at the Gibsons fire hall Tuesday night, but not without citing their disappointment with the community, which brought them to their decision.

Council voted four to one to reject with only Coun. Gerry Tretick voting in favour.

The decision came after months of community debate and an open house held Nov. 27 in which residents gave a firm thumbs down to the proposal.

Rogers had proposed to pick up the estimated $120,000 cost for the new tower, while using it to upgrade the company’s cell phone service. But now after council’s decision, the Sunshine Coast Regional District (SCRD) will be tasked with budgeting for the cost of the tower, which works out to about $6 per household for SCRD residents.

The SCRD and the Town say a new radio tower is needed to ensure good emergency communications.

Council cited the community opposition as the reason for rejecting the Rogers proposal, but made a point of saying many of the opponents’ arguments spread fear in the community and that the scientific information used by opponents to strengthen their arguments was “misused.”

“I also feel very disappointed in the community,” said Coun. Lee Ann Johnson. “People are very frightened and have been stirred up by people within the community sending around a lot of information and, I think, causing dismay that’s unfounded.”

Coun. Dan Bouman said the response from the community was overwhelmingly negative and he didn’t hear one positive comment, which compelled him to vote against the proposal.

“I feel compelled that the public will has come through, and I will vote against the tower, but this is an expensive decision,” Bouman said. “I feel that science has really been misused here. The overwhelming weight of the science for this particular tower in this particular place says that it does not pose a risk to the public.”

Tretick was blunt in his comments, saying in making his decision he looked at the facts over the scare tactics.

“I try to take into consideration facts rather than fears,” said Tretick. “I’m not impressed by the people who go out and create fears among our residents based upon unqualified credentials and Internet research.”


[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2014 Glacier Media Inc.

License Comments

Comments


NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus



About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media: www.glaciermedia.ca    © Copyright 2014 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy
Business in Vancouver Whistler Question Squamish Chief Powell River Peak Real Estate Weekly My Local Flyers

LOG IN



Lost your password?