Sunday April 20, 2014

question of the week

Survey results are meant for general information only, and are not based on recognised statistical methods.

Input to the White Paper



In the news release dated Sept. 9 (Coast Reporter, Sept. 22), the B.C. government has released a White Paper detailing changes to local government elections due in November 2014.

B.C. residents have until Oct. 23 to submit comments on this proposal via this link:

I compliment the Minister and her staff for revising various financial arrangements prevailing in past elections, which will enhance transparency and accountability a great deal.

But, two simple administrative revisions have been overlooked.

My first suggestion is to change the month of local elections from mid-November to early October in 2014, rather than wait until 2017. This will enhance the voting processes for the many snowbirds, catching them before they leave for their holidays; it would also improve the percentage of residents actually voting, currently hovering between 40 and 50 per cent.

The second suggestion involves non-resident candidacy within a given jurisdiction. The Local Government Act (LGA) allows non-residents to stand for election. Should they gain election, their responsibility and accountability rests solely on “conflict of interest,” as defined within another provincial government document, the Community Charter.

But, the definition of conflict of interest is very thin, resting upon either a “direct” or “indirect pecuniary interest” resulting from an elected person’s vote on a matter. An “indirect pecuniary interest” could result from that elected person’s votes on either tax revenue or tax expenditure measures, having no effect on that non-resident elected person. Therefore, that person should either voluntarily or compulsorily recuse themselves from any discussion/vote on tax topics coming before that local government. To do otherwise conflicts with the Community Charter’s apparent intentions.

But, a simple revision to the LGA, precluding persons standing for election within a jurisdiction other than one in which they are resident, would solve the issue once and for all.

Brian K. Sadler, Gibsons



NOTE: To post a comment in the new commenting system you must have an account with at least one of the following services: Disqus, Facebook, Twitter, Yahoo, OpenID. You may then login using your account credentials for that service. If you do not already have an account you may register a new profile with Disqus by first clicking the "Post as" button and then the link: "Don't have one? Register a new profile".

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We do not allow personal attacks, offensive language or unsubstantiated allegations. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher, or see our Terms and Conditions.

blog comments powered by Disqus

About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS   Glacier Community Media:    © Copyright 2014 Glacier Community Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy
Business in Vancouver Whistler Question Squamish Chief Powell River Peak Real Estate Weekly My Local Flyers


Lost your password?