Thursday September 02, 2010
Find local businesses. Fast!


Local News

Council votes to lose parking, not expropriate

License
Share |

Sechelt council has endorsed a Ministry of Transportation and Infra-structure (MOTI) plan to widen Highway 101 on the oceanside of the southeast end of Davis Bay, eliminating 15 to 20 parking stalls and some landscape and seating.

The Ministry had previously put forward a plan which would widen the highway on the residential side, and required the expropriation of property. Widening that stretch of highway is one of several safety-targeted highway upgrades MOTI plans to carry out in Davis Bay this fall, for a total cost of $2.5 million.

Sechelt council voted July 21 to endorse the oceanside highway widening plan, as well as the closure of Westly Road where it meets the highway, and add a traffic light to the Davis Bay Road intersection with the highway.

Discussions that evening centred around which design to use for widening the highway, or whether it should be widened at all.

Regarding the oceanside widening plan, Coun. Keith Thirkell raised questions about the risks of eliminating any buffer between seawall pedestrian traffic and the highway.

“Our kids could fall into traffic, literally,” he said.

Mayor Darren Inskster reminded councillors that the alternative design involved expropriation.

“I can’t support that,” he said. “I don’t think taking people’s fences and their yards away is appropriate.”

Coun. Alice Janisch echoed Thirkell’s pedestrian-safety concerns, suggesting neither option was appropriate. “I think we should drop the whole thing,” she said. “The highway will come right up to the sidewalk and I just think that’s a very bad thing to do.”

Coun. Fred Taylor said he would reluctantly vote for the oceanside widening plan as the best compromise, adding council needs to continue pressuring the Ministry for more substantive funding for a bypass.

“The bigger issue is not this, the bigger issue is the bypass,” he said. “So we’re going to be faced with piecemealing this [highway] for, I think, a number of years until the provincial government gets their act together.”

Council passed the recommendation to endorse the oceanside widening plan, with Thirkell and Janisch opposed.

Council also passed a recommendation for a “soft” closure of Westly Road, using planter boxes, and allowing for the road to be re-opened in the event of a bypass being constructed.

According to a staff report, cost savings of more than $300,000 can be achieved by closing off Westly, rather than an initial MOTI plan to re-configure the intersection with the highway to eliminate left turns. Those savings can be applied to shoulder widening along the Selma Park stretch of the highway.


[Get Copyright Permissions] Click here for reuse options!
Copyright 2010 Glacier Media Inc.

License
Share |

Comments

Sort Comments:


0
0

Shasta says...

I wonder if the home owners that complained so adamantly to get Council and MOT to change their plan realize that pedestrians will no longer be safe from the traffic and that without the current amount of available parking Davis Bay will suffer economically. Let's not be greedy here and allow tourists or Coasters to continue parking on the ocean side so we can ALL continue to enjoy our beautiful coast. Why should the people with money dictate what will happen? Sharing is really beneficial.

Posted on August 4, 2010 @ 9:04 pm PST | Report post to Editor | 4386105 

0
0

Simon says says...

Smart move Council,

May I make a suggestion here,
that would both improve tourism for the area, keep pedestrians safe, provide parking for both pedestrians and tourists,
and somewhat satisfy the property owners in a middle ground kind of way.

Firstly, the people who bought those homes got there somehow, they drove there.
We all know,including, waterfront property owners alongside a roadway, especially an 'only roadway' that eventually,
as everything does indeed expand, and that they were kinda lucky for all these years,
that yes, it was merely a matter of time till encroachment would affect them.

Secondly, it would be foolhardy to take away this tourism attraction.
Yes,it is a great place to take a rest enduring the long ferry commute.
No,I have no vested interest in any way.
I actually would rather the traffic would not stop there for a myriad of reasons.
This may or may not be the intent, but,
there is no where like it, stunningly awesome.
How can we take this away from 'the people'.
Unless, we do want to take it away from the people.
But,,,it would be missed severely

Thirdly, those home owners would rather the traffic stopped on the other side of the street than in front of their homes.
They can ponder this whilst thinking further into the future of just how much money they'll rake in
from the developers (off-shore) whom will purchase their properties to build high density waterfront condohomes (dog forbid)

Fourthly, there is some land to the left of Davis Bay, where some old boarded up homes exist,
and a small (very) portion of that could be a paid parking lot which would generate revenue and
proceeds go to the Tree Park (whatever) rejuvenation area.
I think its icky to have those cars parked in that beautiful place

Finally, to accomodate ferry traffic, and local busy traffic times, traffic lights , yes those crazy red x's and green o's,
could indicate the directionally appropriate lane opening, for the single extra laneway expansion,
((I think the average kindergartner could figure this out, another good reason for zero tolerance...having to think and drive))
and only half the needed width for that lane could be expropriated from the property owners and the other from the waterfront parking area,
and hugemoungously thick pylons erected to stop vehicles from plummeting into our kids and Grammas,
with a widening of the boardwalk to accomodate small vendor stands (just a few and they change regurlarly to keep it interesting)
creating plenty-o-walking room with only the worry of a missed whale sighting

...the future is near and malleable,

and can be brilliant and peaceful

SoS

Posted on July 31, 2010 @ 5:16 am PST | Report post to Editor | 4362484 

Post a comment

You must be Registered and logged in to post a comment.

Register or

The Coast Reporter welcomes your opinions and comments. We reserve the right to edit comments for length, style, legality and taste and reproduce them in print, electronic or otherwise. For further information, please contact the editor or publisher.




About Us | Advertising | Contact Us | Sitemap / RSS    Glacier Interactive Media & their Glacier Websites    © Copyright 2010 Glacier Interactive Media | User Agreement & Privacy Policy

LOG IN



Lost your password?